1. Is there any legal option of employing a pharmacist, except for a standard contract, which would be beneficial to the employee when it comes to paying less tax, health insurance etc. so that such an employee gets bigger NET pay?
I know that locums are self-employed but can a pharmacist be self-employed and perform exactly the same duties as if he was employed on contract? That is: work only in one pharmacy, monday to friday, 9 to 5, plus, let's say, two saturdays a month?
3. Can a pharmacist with one year's experience in retail who is on a standard contract reach or exceed the yearly salary of 30 000 GBP NET? Does it require doing much overtime? I reckon a locum can earn this easily, can't he?
I know that locums are self-employed but can a pharmacist be self-employed and perform exactly the same duties as if he was employed on contract? That is: work only in one pharmacy, monday to friday, 9 to 5, plus, let's say, two saturdays a month?
3. Can a pharmacist with one year's experience in retail who is on a standard contract reach or exceed the yearly salary of 30 000 GBP NET? Does it require doing much overtime? I reckon a locum can earn this easily, can't he?
Comment