Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlingcross Does anyone know if the rules prohibiting an employer from recruiting an overseas, RPSGB registered Pharmacist into a branch under 3 years old is under review?
Seems like a strange one to me!
Surely this could be a restriction of working! What do you think? |
Don't get me started on this topic again...[sigh]
Here's an extract from the Health Act 2006, part 3, chapter 2, section 139:
" New section 70(5) sets out a requirement that where pharmacy premises in Great Britain have been registered for less than three years, the responsible pharmacist may not be a pharmacist who is a pharmacist by virtue of section 4A of the Pharmacy Act 1954 (i.e. a pharmacist who is qualified in another EU state whose qualification is recognised in the UK). Article 2(1) of Directive 85/433/EEC provides for Member States to recognise specified diplomas etc awarded by other Member States. Article 2(2) of the Directive, however provides for a derogation under which member States need not give effect to the diplomas with respect to pharmacies open to the public, which have been in operation for less than 3 years. Section 70(5) exercises that derogation in relation to Great Britain."
So you could be born in the UK, from a British mother & father, have full British nationality etc..., but if your degree is from Dublin University, you're stuffed, you still can't be left as sole Phcist in control of a recently-opened pharmacy...