Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: MURs by trained technicians

  1. #11
    kemzero is offline King Amongst Members
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Planet earth! 220 knots south 20 west somewhat
    Posts
    381

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve G View Post
    Techs should be able to support pharmacists doing MURs - I have no problem with them selling the service to patients and filling in some of the paperwork beforehand. In fact I know a great way a tech could support me doing MURs - be a checking tech so I don't have to worry about the pile of scripts from the surgery.

    And seriously, if MURs were delegated to techs, do you think the govt. would pay £25 per MUR? I doubt it. It's also difficult enough to get GPs on side as it is. It would be almost impossible if it was techs doing them.

    I am quite happy to delegate technical tasks where possible, but not cognitive services. We need to be comfortable with MURs before we can move on to prescribing. Delegating to techs wont help at all.
    Point taken! I guess its all about maintaining bounderies , a tech with a clinical pharmacy post graduate qualification should be able to do MURs , as MURs are not even supposed to be clinical. In my opinion the pharmacist MUST sign it off though. Less qualified people currently provide stop smoking advice/treatment . Its all in the mix....I mean about skill mix !

  2. #12
    ramroum is offline Top-Class Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by kemzero View Post
    Combined Oral Contraceptives??
    Maybe we should ban the use of Acromyns on this forum they can be somewhat confusing..what say you all?
    Dear Kem,

    Thank you. It is good to keep the abbreviations but with an explanation about what they are to learn from it.

  3. #13
    Zoggite's Avatar
    Zoggite is offline Simply Ze Best!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    970
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve G View Post
    Techs should be able to support pharmacists doing MURs - I have no problem with them selling the service to patients and filling in some of the paperwork beforehand. In fact I know a great way a tech could support me doing MURs - be a checking tech so I don't have to worry about the pile of scripts from the surgery.

    And seriously, if MURs were delegated to techs, do you think the govt. would pay £25 per MUR? I doubt it. It's also difficult enough to get GPs on side as it is. It would be almost impossible if it was techs doing them.

    I am quite happy to delegate technical tasks where possible, but not cognitive services. Delegating to techs wont help at all.
    Steve,
    you echo my views perfectly.
    Besides, how can you "sign off" a Medicines Use Review? (no acronyms, remember?!)A significant part of the benefits of such reviews is to communicate with the patient, listen to them and respond to their worries/queries, and to get them to take ownership of their medication regime, thus increasing concordance; we'll miss that target completely if we just delegate the "one-to-one" bit and let our only involvement in the whole review be a byro-stain on the bottom of a form...

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve G View Post
    We need to be comfortable with MURs before we can move on to prescribing.
    I still maintain that I have been "prescribing" since the first day that I qualified; just because I don't use green bits of paper and I restrict myself to medicines that don't have a little square that says "POM" (or Prescription-Only Medicine), doesn't mean it's not prescribing?!?
    Ze genuine Article, present & perfect!

  4. #14
    Steve G is offline Registered Pharmacist
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    293
    Ok then, prescribing at NHS expense, including POMs.

  5. #15
    Linnear's Avatar
    Linnear is offline Registered Pharmacist
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Cornwall, UK
    Posts
    760
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve G View Post
    Ok then, prescribing at NHS expense, including POMs.
    Shouldn't that be National Health Service not NHS?
    Linnear MRPharmS

    Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: The biggest cause of brain damage and 100% preventable.

    In pregnancy: 1 fag is not safe, 1 x-ray is not safe and 1 drink is not safe.



    For handy pharmacy links try
    pharmacistance.co.uk

    If you like my posts or letters in the journal try my books!
    eloquent-e-tales

  6. #16
    Zoggite's Avatar
    Zoggite is offline Simply Ze Best!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    970
    Quote Originally Posted by Linnear View Post
    Shouldn't that be National Health Service not NHS?
    Or, as it's St David's Day tomorrow,"Gwasanaeth Gwybodaeth Iechyd Cymru"
    Ze genuine Article, present & perfect!

  7. #17
    Linnear's Avatar
    Linnear is offline Registered Pharmacist
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Cornwall, UK
    Posts
    760
    Quote Originally Posted by Zoggite View Post
    Or, as it's St David's Day tomorrow,"Gwasanaeth Gwybodaeth Iechyd Cymru"
    Gesundheit!
    Linnear MRPharmS

    Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: The biggest cause of brain damage and 100% preventable.

    In pregnancy: 1 fag is not safe, 1 x-ray is not safe and 1 drink is not safe.



    For handy pharmacy links try
    pharmacistance.co.uk

    If you like my posts or letters in the journal try my books!
    eloquent-e-tales

  8. #18
    taskerrose is offline Active Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    13

    Re: MURs by trained technicians

    techs in hospital undertake drug histories (once trained) ok it still has to be validated by a pharmacist but we do the job really well, we also talk to patients on managing medicines advising them how to take their medicines correctly and storage you would not believe the no of patients who have no clue on short expiry products such as eye drops etc, yes I know community pharmacists are really buzy and do not have the time to talk to all the patients personally at the point of collection but that's where a good well trained tech comes in, picking up the more mundane tasks to free up the pharmacist. It all boils down to training and keeping skills up to date as the role of pharmacy keeps changing,
    Koul Kougar likes this.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •