I have read through a few posts in this section and I have found this quote quite a few times. Does this quote applies just to the manufacturing sites or even the R&D sites?

Although the R&D site of AZ has been closed down, leaving regulatory departments and etc. However the largest R&D site of Pfizer in Europe is still running in Sandwich, UK.

I rmb I hv asked an university professor about where are the R&D sites distributed in the world recently, and he said mostly Europe, USA, some in Singapore and a little bit in Japan. I presume that China doesn't have any R&D sites? (concerned about China as I am a Chinese).

With assuming that the quote only applies to manu. sites, does that mean only affecting the position of QP? any other post will be disadvantaged in this case? (tho a professor said the value of pharmacist at these posts is reduced due to the fact that the director levels of employers are now not pharmacist. They don't tend to take pharmacist which is disappointing.)

On the other hand, is there any relation/impact/vacancies raised for industrial pharmacist by the newly opened government invested biological park in UK?

Thanks