![]() |
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Hospital Pharmacy Forum Working or thinking of working in hospital pharmacy? Post threads here. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Quote:
Since you're the pre-reg you're probably going to have to grin and bear the unifrom choice (unless there's enough pharmacist-rebels who don't wear it). Depending upon the overall attitude of the pharmacy, you may be able to argue your case for wearing a suit after pre-reg. |
| |||
| Quote:
Many thanks for your reply. Last edited by ramroum : 14th, January 2008 at 08:09 PM. |
| |||
| At the 3 local hospitals I have had contact with pharmacy staff in:- Pharmacists and techs who never left the pharmacy area wore shirt and tie with trousers / blouse and trousers type of clothing unless their duties dictated the wearing of any protective clothing which they would don for that task and then remove. They usually attached ID to a belt hoop / waistband so at glance you would not know what/who they were. Pharmacists and techs who did the ward medication and discharge medication rounds wore white cotton lab coats religiously usually with a "Pharmacy" ID badge prominently hooked onto the right breast pocket. Under the coat they wore the same stuff as the staff who stayed in the pharmacy, though techs carried these strange satchels with a manner of diagnostic equipment, BNF and a ream of notifications to give to the various Doctors about botched prescriptions they needed fixing. mr_colt |
| |||
| Thanks Mr clot for the info. By the way, did anyone do pre reg exam recently (last Friday), could you please describe your experience, many thanks. Last edited by ramroum : 14th, January 2008 at 08:06 PM. |
| |||
| Quote:
Lots of techs think they're capable of using the BNF correctly - they don't realise the pharmacology/pharmokinetics/pharmodynamics knowledge one needs to understand to make educated decisions from it. Hmph. Last edited by N.T : 2nd, July 2007 at 07:16 PM. Reason: wrong word |
| |||
| I really have no idea why the techs carried them but not the pharmacists; The techs packs mostly contained a digital blood pressure machine (I don't call them sphygmomanometer's as they technically aren't), peak flow tester and a number of those damn Cialis sponsored alcohol-gel spray bottles. I swear that the branded drugs freebies have become a compulsory requirement to get NICE approval these days. I know what you mean about proper pharm knowledge, one that gets me is I had to explain to my own Pain consultant about how Tramadol is worthless to take in a person who is on Ondansetron or similar 5HT3 antagonist. I don't expect consultants to be encyclopedias but a little pharmacology brush-up in their subject area every once in a while wouldnt go amiss. I find the best way to deal with it is to imagine you can impart the knowledge directly into their brain via a rather heavy copy of Martindale's mr_colt (not "clot," thank you.) |
| |||
| As to why exactly it does; I can't tell you. Pharmacoligists can't currently explain why; what they do know is that Tramadol alone seems to have a need to attach itself to the 5HT3 receptors in the spine to have a sufficient analgesic effect. Obviously 5HT3 antagonists actively prevent a lot of this from happening. Its been the subject of a number of clinical trials in recent years; this is mainly due to the increased use due to the fall in cost as GSK maintained a prohibitively priced brand patient for 20 years. It used to be the preserve of chemotherapy patients but the use for post-operative nausea has increased significantly in recent years as generics came in. Obviously analgesics are going to be used to great extent on surgical wards, this led to the discovery about the drugs incompatibility. After that; numerous clinical trials were run. Here's one of the better ones: Ondansetron inhibits the analgesic effects of tramadol: a possible 5-HT(3) spinal receptor involvement in acute pain in humans. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jun;94(6):1553-7, table of contents. PMID: 12032025 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] mr_colt. |
| |||
| Quote:
|