Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: PDA Insight - Scary Stuff

  1. #1
    Web Ferret is offline King Amongst Members
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    547

    PDA Insight - Scary Stuff

    In the Winter 2011 Insight from the PDA:

    NPA Sue a past employee of ASDA for negligence
    Now the NPA are suing pharmacists for dispensing errors

    Facebook post online at your peril and face dismissal
    Have a rant on FB (or in here) and not specifically mention a company and you could lose your job.

    Employment Tribunal decides dismissal for failing to follow SOPs (to the letter) is a proportionate sanction
    Pharmacist uses professional common sense, gets sacked, ET agrees.

    Also scary stories about bullying employers when a pharmacist wants to take a lunch break and MUR targets.

    Payout to "harmed" patent £1,500, legal bill £17,000

    Its a jungle out there - The PDA are actively fighting our corner so all you newbies join up if you haven't already.

  2. #2
    Fleegle's Avatar
    Fleegle is offline An beagle le dearcadh
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tíre Dias
    Posts
    2,297

    Re: PDA Insight - Scary Stuff

    And to think I was seriously considering a return to UK pharmacy.

  3. #3
    culchie82 is offline King Amongst Members
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    383

    Re: PDA Insight - Scary Stuff

    I gather that when it comes to defending individual Pharmacist's interests, the NPA are about as useful as tits on a bull. Would I be right in that assertion?

  4. #4
    johnep is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    5,733

    Re: PDA Insight - Scary Stuff

    Absolutely, first mission for NPA is to protect the employer.
    johnep

  5. #5
    Tony Schofield's Avatar
    Tony Schofield is offline Registered Pharmacist
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    South Tyneside
    Posts
    1,222

    Re: PDA Insight - Scary Stuff

    Yes. The contractor has insurance arranged through NPA usually. If an error occurs the RP may have been responsible but the companies indemnity insurance will cough up. Now if the company seeks to discipline the pharmacist, the pharmacist can't seek support from the NPA insurance. I haven't heard of NPA insurance persuing an employee for restitution but I fear it is a scenario that could at some point arise.

    As most multiples can argue that an error is simply a breach of SOP, if an aggrieved patient took action against the pharmacist, the company liability could be in doubt and the pharmacist may be alone in defending him/her self against a civil action. There are all manner of complex arguments about liability and I would assume that company insurance would cover everything as the company is the contractor and responsible for the discharge of the contract, but in this day and age I wouldn't count on it. Also where would an individual pharmacist have the wherewithall to fight his/her corner in such a situation?

    As everyone here, including me, says, join the PDA.

  6. #6
    SolomonQ's Avatar
    SolomonQ is offline King Amongst Members
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    992

    Re: PDA Insight - Scary Stuff

    How about not renewing subscription to the RPS and re-investing that money for a membership of the PDA? good idea?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •