View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25th, May 2006, 07:20 PM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Forum Creator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 1,678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kemzero
Dear Members

just want to get the general consensus on remote supervision,The PDA (Pharmacy defence Association) and a few other camps seem to be against it.The PharmSoc,Multiples & the NPA seem to be all for it .

I think it's the only way forward for pharmacists (but there has to be a few limits and defined roles for techs )....what are your thots..especially as the pharmacists will still be legally liable..vicarious liability is not an option!
What roles are we going to do Kem? Today I got two scripts from nurses, one for a seretide inhaler, the other for erythromycin. I was told the two nurses could prescribe anything. That's prescribing covered then!

The NPA represent the multiples, who will need fewer pharmacists - so of course they want it. The society are the police to us, so I don't know why they do or don't want it as I don't follow the politics of it.

I personally don't want to work any closer with GP's, so where does that leave us all? I'm thinking of selling up and living on a boat..........
__________________
Admin

Please never reveal personal details on the forum.

Keep it clean because I'll be watching !
Reply With Quote