I was a newly qualified hospital pharmacist not so long ago. I also did a clinical diploma and then in a moment of lack of parity did my MSc too.
Time commitment:
Well, it is an advanced diploma at Masters level so it ain’t easy. We used to do modules which consisted of 8 weeks of distance learning with a 2-3 day course in the middle. I used to be given an afternoon a week for study (rarely taken, this is the NHS…) and then put in about then same amount of my own time (usually a complete weekend or two at the end of the 8 weeks). Obviously, some modules were harder than others.
Is it beneficial?
If you want to become a full blooded, career hospital/clinical pharmacist – you will need a diploma. You might be lucky to be a band 7 job without but you’ll never get an 8 without. The MSc looks good too – but another year of work and not essential. You have to remember that NHS jobs get awarded on a point system. If you have a clinical diploma you get more points and hence, more likely to get a job. An MSc is worth even more points.
I think if you want to stay in hospital pharmacy, you would benefit from doing the diploma – and hey, it sorts out all your CPD worries for 2 years….  |