View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 19th, September 2006, 07:36 PM
Steve G Steve G is offline
King Amongst Members
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 288
Default

But you still need a pharmacist with an ACT because the scripts have to be clinically checked by the pharmacist.

I don't see ACTs as a threat, I see them as giving me some freedom and the oppurtunity to do things like MURs and warfarin clinics. In fact, the less checking I do (accuracy checking, not clinical checks), the better. I didn't train for five years to check that Mrs Muggings has got the bendroflumethazide 2.5mg her script asked for. And as for checking nomads and manrex, that's definitely the less the better.
Reply With Quote